Category: Uncategorized (Page 3 of 5)

I’m listening to Klaus Schulze and he’s really good at creepy ambient stuff.

I feel like, had technology been around to allow the production of this sort of music, it would have been perfectly on-time 50 years earlier. That’s a mismatch between the artistic aspiration and the faculties of the time to meet the requirements. Maybe painting and stage-play was then at where this music arrives later.

We have to consider the time-fractured sensorium, owing technological disparities, as a player in the defeat over the holistic human individual and their own coherent emotional expression. This is the trauma of the bomb, and the post-war ear.

Jackhammers and machines created Jazz with all its discontinuities out of environmental impetus. Le Corbusier called the staggered skyline of Manhattan “hot jazz in stone.” But perhaps ambient music was something ideal to counteract all …

In the past two weeks I’ve been interviewed twice on two different excellent podcasts.

The first was for the first McLuhan Symposium on the Parallax Podcast Sweeny vs Bard hosted by Alexander Bard and Andrew Sweeny.

And the second was with James Kourtides on his podcast The Rooster’s Crow.

Check them both out!…

Hey folks!

I know it looks like not much has happened here lately, but that’s because I’ve been working on lots of larger projects.

First and foremost: I’m very pleased to take on the responsibilities of Journal Production Manager and Associate Editor for The New Explorations Journal out of the University of Toronto. This peer-reviewed academic journal assumes the mission statement of Marshall McLuhan and Ted Carpenter’s original Explorations journal. We also run a regularly-updated blog (linked to above) to which I’ve been contributing new writings!

But what about the podcast?

I’ve had lots of ideas about what to do with Life in the Foam. However, once again, I haven’t been inactive. The New Explorations Journal also has a podcast which has already released three episodes (at the time of this posting).

When the next copy of the journal …

Californian film-maker and James Joyce aficionado Gerry Fialka and I sat down for a very interesting interview on July 24th, 2020. He’s been collecting thought-provoking questions and I tried to give them my best answers. 🙂…

Very glad to present to the Media Ecology Association yesterday. 🙂…

After Marshall McLuhan’s passing in 1980, educator and lifetime New Yorker Neil Postman became the central figure in the field which has come to be known as Media Ecology.

Through his work both in founding Media Ecology as a graduate program and in authoring many of its key texts, such as Amusing Ourselves to Death, Technopoly, and Building a Bridge to the Eighteenth Century Postman taught generations growing up late in the age of television—during the early rise of microcomputers—to use enlightenment values in carefully and consciously assessing the potentials and morality of modern technology through consideration of his six questions, which are:

1. What is the problem to which this technology is the solution?

2. Whose problem is it?

3. Which people and what institutions might be most seriously harmed by a technological solution?

4. What new

Human being can be considered from two inextricably interwoven perspectives: Human nature and the human condition. Think of it as nature vs. nurture, except what is nurturing our being is the total physical environment all together.

Since post-modern theories of Social Constructionism focuses only on the content of media as environmentally-constitutive, it fails to present a relatable account of the contemporary human condition for a growing number of people. That is where Media Ecology comes in.

Creating and internalizing a fuller view of our material, technological world allows all human being—human beings—to become clearer and more relatable by relief. People as products of their environment become distinct and empathetic as we internalize the total environment as backdrop and see how it differently shapes all of us.

Only once we see the physical world for what it is can we put …

Continuing my extraction of interviews from the 1995 Understand McLuhan interactive CD-ROM, I’m very happy to share an interview with Robert K. Logan, former University of Toronto physics professor, communications theorist, author and collaborator with Marshall McLuhan. His defense of his colleague and friend, McLuhan Misunderstood: Setting the Record Straight, is an invaluable essay providing essential context for reading and empathizing with the “guru of the electronic age”. Nobody can better provide a “hard science”-informed bridge to the enigmatic, artistic McLuhan than Bob Logan.

Q: Can you tell us a bit about your relationship with Marshall McLuhan?

A: Well, I would like to talk about my relationship with Marshall McLuhan, because it was a great privilege to have known this man and to have been able to have collaborated with him. I was first introduced to him by …